Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:05
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
A father of 3 felt healthy. Then a routine screening found a rare, deadly illness. - CBS News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Apple Has a Huge Siri Problem That WWDC 2025 Probably Won’t Fix - Gizmodo
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Devin Harjes, "Boardwalk Empire" and "Manifest" actor, dies at 41 - CBS News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
With a housing crisis going on, should we make owning properties illegal?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Brutal 100-degree temperatures will hit cities from Boston to Washington - The Washington Post
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Steam is finally adding native support for Macs with Apple Silicon - The Verge
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Joni Ernst Issues Non-Apology for Joke About People Dying Due to GOP Medicaid Cuts - Rolling Stone
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.